Prioritizing Technical Debt as if Time & Money Matters • Adam Tornhill • GOTO 2019
What it is
Adam Tornhill's GOTO Copenhagen 2019 talk on how to prioritize technical debt in large codebases. It argues for combining code complexity with change frequency (hotspots) from version control data, rather than trying to quantify debt in the abstract.
Why Hacker News recommends it
Cited as a practical approach to finding the technical debt that matters, and as a reference for codebase visualization.
- 1 people recommended it
- 1 different months
- 0 strong recommendations
- first 2021, last 2022
What HN commenters said
“I think Adam Tornhill has a nice take on this.”
Focus on high-complexity, high-churn areas rather than quantifying tech debt.
clumsysmurf, 2021-01 · Recommendation · in “Code Age vs. Time to Recall”
Excerpts from Hacker News comments, linked to the originals. Summaries and labels were written by a language model from those comments.
Topics: technical debt, code hotspots, code churn, software evolution, code analysis
Also recommended by the same people
talk🚀 TDD, Where Did It All Go Wrong (Ian Cooper)DevTernity Conference · 11 HN recommenders · 2018–2024
talkBret Victor The Future of ProgrammingJoey Reid · 12 HN recommenders · 2017–2026
talk"Uncle" Bob Martin - "The Future of Programming"Paul Stringer's Mobile Tech · 10 HN recommenders · 2016–2022
talkTim Ewald - Clojure: Programming with Hand ToolsClojureTV · 9 HN recommenders · 2014–2024
talkUsing Python to Code by VoiceNext Day Video · 12 HN recommenders · 2013–2025
talkTransforming Code into Beautiful, Idiomatic PythonNext Day Video · 9 HN recommenders · 2014–2022
talkAgile is Dead • Pragmatic Dave Thomas • GOTO 2015GOTO Conferences · 11 HN recommenders · 2016–2026
talkPlover: Thought to Text at 240 WPMNext Day Video · 8 HN recommenders · 2014–2023